Header

Node Application Servers in 2025: From Express to Modern Solutions

Devops & Infrastructure, Node, Open Source, and Tips & Tricks

Post Image

The Node.js ecosystem offers various solutions for serving applications, from traditional HTTP servers to modern, performance-focused alternatives. Let's explore the options available for production deployments.

Traditional Solutions

Express

The most popular Node.js web framework:

Pros:

  • Massive ecosystem
  • Simple and intuitive
  • Extensive middleware
  • Great documentation
  • Huge community support
const express = require('express');
const app = express();

app.use(express.json());

app.get('/', (req, res) => {
  res.json({ status: 'ok' });
});

app.listen(3000);

Cons:

  • Single-threaded
  • Performance limitations
  • No built-in clustering
  • Manual optimisation needed

Fastify

Modern, fast alternative to Express:

Pros:

  • Significantly faster than Express
  • Built-in validation
  • TypeScript support
  • Lower memory footprint
  • Plugin system
const fastify = require('fastify')();

fastify.get('/', async (request, reply) => {
  return { hello: 'world' }
});

fastify.listen({ port: 3000 });

Cons:

  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Learning curve
  • Less middleware available

Modern Solutions

Bun

Ultra-fast JavaScript runtime and server:

Pros:

  • Extremely fast startup
  • Built-in bundler
  • Express compatibility
  • Low memory usage
  • SQLite support
// Bun server example
const server = Bun.serve({
  port: 3000,
  async fetch(req) {
    return new Response('Hello World');
  }
});

Cons:

  • Still in development
  • Limited ecosystem
  • Some npm packages incompatible

uWebSockets.js

Low-level, high-performance server:

Pros:

  • Incredible performance
  • Low memory footprint
  • WebSocket optimised
  • SSL/TLS support
  • Binary protocols
const uWS = require('uWebSockets.js');

const app = uWS.App().get('/', (res, req) => {
  res.end('Hello World!');
}).listen(3000, (token) => {
  if (token) {
    console.log('Listening to port 3000');
  }
});

Cons:

  • Complex API
  • Low-level implementation
  • Less abstraction
  • Steeper learning curve

Performance Comparisons

Request Handling (req/sec)

Hello World benchmark:

Express:        8,000
Fastify:       30,000
Bun:           50,000
uWebSockets:   70,000

Memory Usage

Base memory footprint:

Express:     ~40MB
Fastify:     ~30MB
Bun:         ~20MB
uWebSockets: ~15MB

Modern Architecture Patterns

Clustering with PM2

// ecosystem.config.js
module.exports = {
  apps: [{
    name: 'app',
    script: 'server.js',
    instances: 'max',
    exec_mode: 'cluster',
    autorestart: true,
    watch: false,
    max_memory_restart: '1G'
  }]
};

Worker Threads

const { Worker, isMainThread, parentPort } = require('worker_threads');

if (isMainThread) {
  const worker = new Worker(__filename);
  worker.on('message', (msg) => console.log(msg));
} else {
  // Heavy computation
  parentPort.postMessage('Done!');
}

Advanced Features

WebSocket Implementation

// Fastify WebSocket
fastify.register(require('@fastify/websocket'));

fastify.get('/ws', { websocket: true }, (connection, req) => {
  connection.socket.on('message', message => {
    connection.socket.send('Message received');
  });
});

HTTP/2 Support

// HTTP/2 with Express
const spdy = require('spdy');
const express = require('express');
const app = express();

const options = {
  key: fs.readFileSync('./server.key'),
  cert: fs.readFileSync('./server.crt')
};

spdy.createServer(options, app)
  .listen(3000);

Production Optimisations

Security Middleware

const helmet = require('helmet');
const rateLimit = require('express-rate-limit');

app.use(helmet());
app.use(rateLimit({
  windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000,
  max: 100
}));

Caching Strategies

const cache = require('memory-cache');

app.get('/data', (req, res) => {
  const key = req.url;
  const cachedResponse = cache.get(key);

  if (cachedResponse) {
    return res.json(cachedResponse);
  }

  // Fetch data
  const data = getData();
  cache.put(key, data, 5 * 60 * 1000); // 5 minutes
  res.json(data);
});

Deployment Configurations

Docker Setup

FROM node:18-alpine

WORKDIR /app
COPY package*.json ./
RUN npm install --production
COPY . .

ENV NODE_ENV=production
EXPOSE 3000

CMD ["npm", "start"]

Kubernetes Configuration

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: node-app
spec:
  replicas: 3
  template:
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: node-app
        image: node-app:1.0
        resources:
          limits:
            memory: "512Mi"
            cpu: "500m"
        livenessProbe:
          httpGet:
            path: /health
            port: 3000

If you are considering Docker or Kubernetes you will need to have your own Shell Server in order to be able to manage this, at least, for the time being.

Monitoring and Observability

Prometheus Metrics

const prometheus = require('prom-client');
const collectDefaultMetrics = prometheus.collectDefaultMetrics;

collectDefaultMetrics();

app.get('/metrics', async (req, res) => {
  res.set('Content-Type', prometheus.register.contentType);
  res.end(await prometheus.register.metrics());
});

OpenTelemetry Integration

const { NodeTracerProvider } = require('@opentelemetry/node');
const { registerInstrumentations } = require('@opentelemetry/instrumentation');

const provider = new NodeTracerProvider();
provider.register();

registerInstrumentations({
  instrumentations: [
    new ExpressInstrumentation(),
    new HttpInstrumentation(),
  ],
});

Making the Right Choice

Choose Express if:

  • Building traditional web applications
  • Need extensive middleware support
  • Want maximum community resources
  • Prioritise development speed

Choose Fastify if:

  • Need better performance than Express
  • Building new applications
  • Want built-in validation
  • Using TypeScript

Choose Modern Solutions if:

  • Maximum performance is crucial
  • Building real-time applications
  • Need minimal resource usage
  • Comfortable with newer technology

Conclusion

The Node.js server landscape continues to evolve, with new solutions pushing the boundaries of performance. While Express remains a solid choice for many applications, alternatives like Fastify and Bun offer compelling advantages for specific use cases.

When deploying with DeployHQ, you can easily manage deployments for any of these server solutions, with support for various deployment strategies and configurations.


Want to learn more about deploying Node.js applications? Check out our Node.js deployment guides or contact our support team for assistance.

#NodeJS #JavaScript #WebDevelopment #Performance #DevOps

A little bit about the author

Facundo | CTO | DeployHQ | Continuous Delivery & Software Engineering Leadership - As CTO at DeployHQ, Facundo leads the software engineering team, driving innovation in continuous delivery. Outside of work, he enjoys cycling and nature, accompanied by Bono 🐶.

Tree

Proudly powered by Katapult. Running on 100% renewable energy.