Header

Java Application Servers in 2025: From Traditional to Cloud Native

Devops & Infrastructure, Java, Open Source, and Tips & Tricks

Post Image

The Java server landscape has evolved dramatically from traditional application servers to modern, cloud-native solutions. Let's explore the options available for deploying Java applications in today's ecosystem.

Traditional Application Servers

Tomcat

The most popular Java web server:

Pros:

  • Lightweight
  • Easy to configure
  • Extensive documentation
  • Large community
  • Battle-tested
<!-- server.xml configuration -->
<Server port="8005" shutdown="SHUTDOWN">
  <Service name="Catalina">
    <Connector port="8080" protocol="HTTP/1.1"
               connectionTimeout="20000"
               redirectPort="8443" />
    <Engine name="Catalina" defaultHost="localhost">
      <Host name="localhost" appBase="webapps"/>
    </Engine>
  </Service>
</Server>

Cons:

  • Limited enterprise features
  • Basic clustering
  • Manual configuration needed

WildFly (formerly JBoss)

Full Java EE/Jakarta EE server:

Pros:

  • Full enterprise features
  • Clustering support
  • Advanced management
  • Microprofile support
  • Security features

Cons:

  • Heavy footprint
  • Complex configuration
  • Resource intensive

Modern Solutions

Spring Boot Embedded

Modern application deployment:

Pros:

  • Self-contained
  • Fast startup
  • Easy configuration
  • Cloud-native ready
  • Great developer experience
@SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
    }
}

// application.properties
server.port=8080
server.tomcat.threads.max=200
server.tomcat.max-connections=10000

Cons:

  • Limited to Spring ecosystem
  • Memory overhead
  • Configuration complexity

Quarkus

Cloud-native Java framework:

Pros:

  • Super fast startup
  • Low memory footprint
  • Native compilation
  • Kubernetes native
  • Developer productivity
@Path("/hello")
public class GreetingResource {
    @GET
    @Produces(MediaType.TEXT_PLAIN)
    public String hello() {
        return "Hello RESTEasy";
    }
}

// application.properties
quarkus.http.port=8080
quarkus.package.type=native

Cons:

  • Newer ecosystem
  • Limited third-party support
  • Learning curve

Micronaut

Modern microservices framework:

Pros:

  • Fast startup time
  • Low memory footprint
  • Cloud native
  • GraalVM support
  • Reactive support
@Controller("/hello")
public class HelloController {
    @Get
    public String index() {
        return "Hello World";
    }
}

Performance Comparisons

Startup Time

Cold start times:

Traditional Tomcat: 15-30s
WildFly:           30-45s
Spring Boot:       5-10s
Quarkus:          0.4s
Micronaut:        1-2s

Memory Usage

Base memory footprint:

Tomcat:           ~100MB
WildFly:          ~250MB
Spring Boot:      ~150MB
Quarkus:          ~50MB
Micronaut:        ~80MB

Modern Features Implementation

Reactive Programming

// Reactive REST endpoint with Spring WebFlux
@RestController
public class ReactiveController {
    @GetMapping("/stream")
    public Flux<String> streamData() {
        return Flux.interval(Duration.ofSeconds(1))
                   .map(i -> "Data " + i);
    }
}

Native Compilation

# GraalVM native compilation for Quarkus
./mvnw package -Pnative \
  -Dquarkus.native.container-build=true \
  -Dquarkus.container-image.build=true

Cloud Native Deployment

Docker Configuration

# Multi-stage build for Spring Boot
FROM openjdk:17-jdk-slim as builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY . .
RUN ./mvnw package

FROM openjdk:17-jre-slim
COPY --from=builder /app/target/*.jar app.jar
ENTRYPOINT ["java", "-jar", "/app.jar"]

Kubernetes Deployment

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: java-app
spec:
  replicas: 3
  template:
    spec:
      containers:
      - name: java-app
        image: java-app:1.0
        resources:
          requests:
            memory: "512Mi"
            cpu: "500m"
          limits:
            memory: "1Gi"
            cpu: "1000m"
        livenessProbe:
          httpGet:
            path: /health
            port: 8080

If you are considering Docker or Kubernetes you will need to have your own Shell Server in order to be able to manage this, at least, for the time being.

Performance Optimization

JVM Tuning

JAVA_OPTS="\
  -XX:+UseG1GC \
  -XX:MaxGCPauseMillis=100 \
  -XX:+UseStringDeduplication \
  -Xms512m \
  -Xmx512m \
  -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m"

Connection Pooling

@Configuration
public class DatabaseConfig {
    @Bean
    public HikariDataSource dataSource() {
        HikariConfig config = new HikariConfig();
        config.setMaximumPoolSize(10);
        config.setMinimumIdle(5);
        config.setIdleTimeout(300000);
        return new HikariDataSource(config);
    }
}

Monitoring and Observability

Prometheus Integration

@Configuration
public class MetricsConfig {
    @Bean
    MeterRegistry prometheusRegistry() {
        return new PrometheusMeterRegistry(PrometheusConfig.DEFAULT);
    }
}

OpenTelemetry Setup

@Bean
public OpenTelemetry openTelemetry() {
    SdkTracerProvider sdkTracerProvider = SdkTracerProvider.builder()
        .addSpanProcessor(BatchSpanProcessor.builder(
            OtlpGrpcSpanExporter.builder()
                .setEndpoint("http://collector:4317")
                .build())
            .build())
        .build();

    return OpenTelemetrySdk.builder()
        .setTracerProvider(sdkTracerProvider)
        .build();
}

Making the Right Choice

Choose Traditional Servers if:

  • Running legacy applications
  • Need full Java EE support
  • Enterprise requirements
  • Existing infrastructure

Choose Spring Boot if:

  • Modern application development
  • Microservices architecture
  • Cloud deployment
  • Fast development cycle

Choose Quarkus/Micronaut if:

  • Serverless deployment
  • Native compilation needed
  • Maximum performance required
  • Resource constraints

Deployment Considerations

Load Balancing

# HAProxy configuration
frontend http_front
    bind *:80
    default_backend http_back

backend http_back
    balance roundrobin
    server server1 127.0.0.1:8080 check
    server server2 127.0.0.1:8081 check

Service Mesh Integration

# Istio Virtual Service
apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1alpha3
kind: VirtualService
metadata:
  name: java-service
spec:
  hosts:
  - java-service
  http:
  - route:
    - destination:
        host: java-service
        subset: v1
      weight: 90
    - destination:
        host: java-service
        subset: v2
      weight: 10

Conclusion

The Java server landscape has evolved significantly, offering solutions for every use case. While traditional servers still have their place, modern frameworks like Quarkus and Micronaut provide compelling advantages for cloud-native applications.

With DeployHQ, you can manage deployments for any of these server solutions, ensuring reliable and consistent deployments across your infrastructure.


Want to learn more about deploying Java applications? Check out our Java deployment guides or contact our support team for assistance.

#Java #CloudNative #Performance #DevOps #Microservices

A little bit about the author

Facundo is the CTO at DeployHQ. He oversees our software engineering team by day and, in his free time, enjoys hobbies such as cycling, spending time in nature, and the company of Bono 🐶

Tree

Proudly powered by Katapult. Running on 100% renewable energy.